Kuala lumpur: Former Economy Minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli returned to the headquarters of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) here today to continue giving statements in connection with investigations into a government contract worth nearly RM1.1 billion.

According to BERNAMA News Agency, Rafizi arrived at about 9.50 am alongside his legal team and stated that he would submit an additional 28 pages of documentary evidence to the investigators. He expressed his intention to voluntarily provide an additional statement to aid the MACC investigation, ensuring it aligns with other evidence not covered during the previous questioning.

Rafizi mentioned that the evidence includes media reports, emphasizing that the collaboration with Arm Holdings was widely reported by the media, with statements and explanations from senior national leaders, unlike the quiet handling of the 1MDB scandal. He hoped that the additional statement and evidence would enable the MACC to conduct a more comprehensive probe and determine further necessary actions.

Rafizi had already spent four days assisting in the investigation. Former MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki had noted that the investigation into the RM1.1 billion investment linked to a strategic partnership agreement between the Economy Ministry and the UK-based Arm Holdings was nearing completion. The MACC has called 22 witnesses so far, including political analyst Chai Jin Shern, with two more witnesses expected to be summoned.

The MACC opened its investigation on February 16 following complaints by three non-governmental organizations alleging that the agreement had been rushed and skewed, potentially exposing the government to financial risks.

Rafizi concluded his evidence submission to the MACC in about two hours, stating that it went smoothly. He reported submitting 10 to 15 additional pages of documents and evidence, thanking the MACC investigating officers for confirming receipt. He expressed hope that this would allow the investigation paper to be finalized and that the investigation could proceed, considering other necessary interviews. Ultimately, he noted that the decision lies with the MACC and the Attorney General.